It matters that people have a way to use the latest findings in psychology beyond buying a pill for depression. It matters that people have a way of looking at their lives that lets them ask the big questions and determine how they want to live – and that this is supported by therapists and mental health professionals.

Posts

The New Apologists for Modernity

Posted on 20 Mar | 1 comment
Mass graves in Rwanda. Photo by Adam Jones.
Mass graves in Rwanda. Photo by Adam Jones.

While it is undeniable that science and technology has improved the living conditions of many, it is patently misleading to imply that, due to these developments, modernity has somehow “triumphed” over the spiritual and religious legacies of our past. And yet this is precisely the suggestion of some of the leading voices in social science. Basing their claims on so-called hard science, such as the evolution of genes and the cleverness of cognitive adaptation, these apologists for industrial Western values put forth platforms that vilify traditional religions (e.g., Harris, Hitchens), that dismiss nonreductionist science (Baker, McFall etc.), and that sharply dichotomize “civilized” (e.g., modern industrialized) from “uncivilized” (e.g., traditional, Middle Eastern) cultures.

But in my view these apologists are far too hasty to assume the mantle of authority, and their own presumptuousness (read polarization) is concerning. Take Steven Pinker’s new book The Better Angels of Our Nature (2012). This work is meticulously composed, packed with data, and rife with statistical analyses. The problem, however, is that it is oversimplified. Pinker’s thesis is that the contemporary world, and in particular, the contemporary “developed” world, is far more peaceable than its preindustrialized predecessors. In the contemporary “developed” world, Pinker (2012) notes there are markedly fewer homicides per capita than there were even a hundred years ago.

While all this may be true on a statistical basis, and Pinker certainly deserves accolades for his command of calculations, it is greatly misleading to then go on and imply, as he does, that the modern industrial world is somehow inured to the violence of the past. This can be contradicted on the basis of horrific recent wars (e.g., in Iraq, Afghanistan, the Balkans, and Rawanda), heightening class divisions in the most industrialized nations, and the ever-present potential for unprecedented global destruction. And let us not forget the “stench,” as philosopher Richard Rorty once intimated, that still looms over the death camps and killing fields of just over sixty years ago. Indeed, regardless of its per capita mayhem, the 20th century was probably the bloodiest century in terms of pure numbers than any other century on record.

Moreover, these records of overt destruction, do not even touch the problems of skyrocketing rates of depression and suicide in our own “advanced” era.

Therefore, before we sever ourselves from our bestial past, let us not underestimate the ongoing outrages of humanity. We are making headway with our technology, our practical cleverness and our wits, but our spiritual and emotional constitutions remain at a dangerously precarious level, and we ignore the "better angels of their nature" at our peril.
   
Author's note: A number of these ideas are further explored in The Polarized Mind: Why It's Killing Us and What We Can Do About It (University Professors Press, April, 2013).

-- Kirk Schneider

Read more stories by Kirk Schneider

Keep up with our community - follow us on Facebook and Twitter 

Comments and Discussions

Although I don't have

Although I don't have statistics at my fingertips, it seems to me that one of the measures of spiritual development is the capacity to accept others who are different. If so, then Western nations, for all the squabbling and imperfections in their socities, have evolved to the point where significant differences are tolerated and people of different cultures and religions can live together in relative peace. Women can run for the highest of political offices, and in the U.S. roughly half the population now supports gay marriage. It's not perfect, but light years ahead of those past and current societies which practiced or still practice the religions that came into being from the axial age through the eighth century CE. The most expansive tolerance of those in the West is found in those who for the most part are the least religious.

I'm not claiming that the West doesn't have real problems of inequality. Nor am I personally vilifying these traditional religions, only pointing out that they are, with some pockets of exception, behind the evolutionary curve.

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube Google Plus

share