Logo for Saybrook University

Posts

On Making Choices and Moral Courage

By: Chuck Piazza | 27 Sep | 4 comments

 


The fall 2012 semester has begun and the organizational systems and human science students are well into their journey exploring ethical issues that arise in organizations and society.

The open and honest conversations have been very engaging and challenging causing all to stop and ponder the thoughtful insights developed, their practical applications to the business sector and the world-at-large, and their ramifications for today’s professionals and leaders during these turbulent times.

What follows are some musings from this journey as I grapple with writing a conference paper on "fostering moral courage" in business professionals that is to be delivered next week.

Musing #1: Much in life relies upon the particular choices we each make. Choices are creative and hold power to shape the world and future.

The type of life we want to live, the creation of a sustainable future, and the organizations conducting businesses in an ethical manner all depend on choices—our choices. Acknowledging that we are not solely responsible, each of these do depend upon our choices and willing active engagement.

While there are many factors that can and do influence each of the above, it still comes down to each of us consciously choosing to:

  • Strive to live the particular life we want;
  • Make social changes needed to live in a manner that respects nature and accepts that we have limited resources; and
  • Hold businesses to being responsible citizens. We do not have to be subject to or trapped by our past or destructive social or business practices. It is our choice.

Choices involve decisions that result in actions. So if we want less stress in our daily lives, to slow global warming and to turn the economic down turn around, we must personally choose to act. 

Musing #2: Fundamentally, being ethical is about making choices—choices that enable us to live in relationship with both other people (as well as ourselves) and the natural world around us in a way that is respectful and not harmful.

Ethics is about creating systems that aid us to structure making choices, establishing relationships, and discerning actions that treat others with dignity and do not harm.

If one chooses, respect can be elevated to care and even compassion and justice, and relationships can become meaningful, life-enhancing partnerships rooted in interdependence and solidarity. Again, a choice.

Musing #3: Besides choice and action, ethics is about courage because life and work is complex and is filled with many challenging dilemmas with no easy solutions. Being ethical involves having the courage to:

  • See and take seriously the personal, professional, civic, global, or environmental situation in which one finds him- or herself, as well as the causes of the situation;
  • Think systemically, identifying the short- and long-term ramifications of the situation and acknowledging any harmful impact upon individuals, society, the global community, and the environment;
  • Inquire about and critically examine any concerns that one may have;
  • Voice concerns and dialogue with others so the reality and one’s questions, insights and conclusions are made known;
  • Engage others in exploration, problem solving and solution creation; 
  • Make decisions that are reasonable, prudent and viable;
  • Willingly pay the cost for being ethical; and
  • Take responsibility for one’s actions whatever the consequences.

Musing #4: Moral courage, though, is not about being a hero, saint or martyr. It is not about bold, audacious actions in the name of being ethical or pursuing truth and justice.

Moral courage involves both emotion and intelligence, intuition and reason, passionate commitment and thoughtful pragmatism. It is guided by virtuous enthusiasm and prudence and calls us to a higher sense of self, a "larger self" that is beyond self interest and acknowledges a need to:

  • Take responsibility for the world in which we live and work,
  • Care about others, and
  • Give of one’s self.

Moral courage entails:

  • Being grounded in one’s convictions;
  • Honestly perceiving and acknowledging what one sees, even if it severely impacts one in a detrimental way;
  • Taking action even if it costs one something;
  • Being willing to stand alone, even if one fails;
  • A willingness to act in the face of adversity;
  • Steadfastness;
  • Willingness to act in a selfless manner for the common good;
  • A sense of giving without promise of return; and
  • Seeking well being, justice and prosperity for the good of all.

When acting in a morally courageous manner, it is important that it is done in the context of ongoing self-examination and critical reflection, including one’s owns viewpoints, assumptions, conclusions, and practices.

Musing #5: A creative tension needs to be maintained between being realistic and idealistic; between being too pragmatic and overly altruistic. They both have their pitfalls.

Pragmatism, being realistic and practical, can create obstacles to being ethical or introducing ethical changes. At times it can foster rationalization that maintains current unethical practices and can lead to a sense of complacency that results in non-action. In the current highly-competitive, profit-driven business climate, it can cause professionals to rationalize away the challenge to make tough or risky decisions, or address harmful organizational conduct, business philosophies, or economic policies and global practices.

Some common pragmatic arguments that, when used improperly, can hinder professionals or organizations from being ethical:

  • The "dirty hands" perspective (or "the ends justifies the means"): One must perform or collaborate in unethical practices to aid the organization and the common good because that is the only way one can act and remain a viable business. To not act, even if it is unethical, would lose the business opportunity.
  • Conventionalism (or compliance with the status quo): One cannot act differently or make changes because this is how business operates.
  • Scale (or powerlessness and hopelessness): The issue is too large and complex, and it is therefore too difficult to make changes. A single person with only one voice is too small and ineffective to make a difference.
  • Self interest: If one acts differently or is confrontative, one could be ostracized, which would negatively affect one’s job, career advancement, financial security, and social or professional status. The personal and professional cost is too great.

Concluding Musing: Considering the significant economic, political, environmental and social issues we face today, one could say that we stand on a precipice.

Many experience this position as a mountain top that enables vision and clarity because of the vistas it provides. While some settle in at the top and proclaim what they see, others travel back down to enhance the well being of the valley inhabitants, though, the route may be long and journey treacherous at times.

Many experience the precipice as an edge—the rim of a canyon that is dangerously deep, filled with the unknown, and risky to navigate. Some pitch camp at the edge and continue to live as securely as they can, while others step into the dark vastness in the spirit of discovery, justice, and adventure willing to engage whatever they encounter for the common good.

How do you experience the turbulent times in which we live? What ethical choices do you face? What actions are you willing to courageously make?

Read other posts by Chuck Piazza

Keep up with our community: Facebook | Twitter | Saybrook's Organizational Systems Program

 

Comments and Discussions

"spin" is the elephant in the room

A discussion of ethics without explicit "musing" about our media induced culture of "Spin" is a sign of how far we are from addressing the real problems.

Listen to the outright lies and half-truths that pollute the political arena. If we live in a "service" economy, why can't we find honest, reasonably priced, competent services?

In 2009-10, a large portion of job listings were for marketing/sales. The firm doesn't need to develop a better product or provide higher quality. They just need to figure out how to convince more people to buy an existing product that obviously nobody really needs or wants.

How many faulty products or shoddy services have you encountered in the last few months? Most of us are so jaded, we no longer even bother to return the product or demand our money back for the bad service. We expect to be sold useless junk via misleading advertising. We expect to encounter service employees so poorly trained, overworked, underpaid and under-appreciated that they are unlikely to function competently.

Personally, for me, the ideas

Personally, for me, the ideas and musings offered in the posting definitely suggest that we are indeed standing at a precipice. There are several economic, political, environmental and social issues that we face collectively as humanity that stem from previous and existing systems that no longer work. Therefore we are at a crucial moment in time when we need to break away from the conventional systems that we have blindly relied on throughout the past. We need to develop and implement better ways of living in and with the environment, new socioeconomic and political systems that strive to work for the wellbeing of all people, everywhere, and reexamine our encounters and perspectives of others not only in America but on a global level. In order to make this happen, it will take individuals possessing moral courage, and spiritual insight to make the first leap over the "rim of a canyon that is dangerously deep, filled with the unknown, and risky to navigate," to move towards the common good, a better way of living, and light the path for others to follow.

Insightful comments Chris.

Insightful comments Chris. You point out the need to identify and implement better ways of living and new socioeconomic and political systems. What specific choices need to be made? What will they entail?

I ask myself those same

I ask myself those same questions in the attempt to work towards an "ideal" answer, but so far I don't think there is a clear-cut answer for either system. The existing socioeconomic and political systems (primarily) in America were developed to benefit a select few at the expense of the majority. So perhaps a quick answer is to reexamine some of the fundamental concepts of socialism in regards to considering the well being of the majority. Similarly, I think we need to reexamine our perception and definition of democracy to actually entail "the voice of the people." Somewhere in the not so distant past, collectively, we let go of the reigns of democracy and began to let a political system manufacture a party and name it democratic. This has led to the American people forfeiting a great deal of their freedom to make choices under the facade of a democratic political process which has ultimately contributed to an American culture consumed by materialism, reality television, and for the most part, an isolated, disconnected way of living which has had debilitating consequences on many Americans and those countries around us.

My purpose in speaking primarily of the systems prevalent in America is due to the fact that if we make progressive changes, we can immediately impact the world around us. From the environment to the devastating effects of globalism, if we begin to think of ourselves as part of a greater "global" system, we will naturally become more conscious and concerned of how our choices and lifestyles impact those around us.

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube Google Plus

share