It matters that people have a way to use the latest findings in psychology beyond buying a pill for depression. It matters that people have a way of looking at their lives that lets them ask the big questions and determine how they want to live – and that this is supported by therapists and mental health professionals.


Travel, Politics, and Tending the Mote In Our Eye

Posted on 28 Aug | 3 comments
Travel, Politics, and Tending the Mote In Our Eye

I don’t vote.

I don’t vote, because I think the system is evolving, and the only way for it to evolve into something good and worthwhile is for people to keep making mistakes. We have to repeat painful errors enough times until we decide to change the system. Meanwhile, we have to continue to live with the consequences of not changing the system, and I choose not to participate in that system until people have finally learned.

Traveling to the East as I have frequently of late, I have been able to observe different political systems at work. At first it was easy to criticize: Singapore has a totalitarian regime, a dictator for life who seems immortal. China has Communism, and we know about Communism from our cold war with the Soviet Union. Other places have other systems.

It is easy to want to agitate for freedom, and more difficult to see the good done by these systems. Singaporeans, for example, have a national identity despite strong ethnic ties—Malays and Chinese and Arabs, primarily—sharing space. The government orders them to live together rather than creating ethnic quarters, because they know living together is a step away from prejudice and insularity.

Could we ever order something like that here? Desegregating the schools was enough trouble, with armed guards necessary to enforce the law. What if we said there was no more segregation of neighborhoods, that each neighborhood had to meet racial quotas? This might prove very dangerous for us, although it works quite well in Singapore.

In Egypt, the people rose up against a dictator, and fairly and democratically elected a far-right Muslim party official to govern them. Given the chance to vote for more freedom, they chose instead to continue the religious traditions of their time and place, including the oppression of women.

Again, it would be easy to criticize. On the other hand, politicians more locally want a set of bills and amendments that look not much different from the laws the Muslim Brotherhood will enact overseas.

The Chinese government is undeniably corrupt; most of the deaths in their 2008 earthquake can be laid at the feet of corrupt officials who took bribes to overlook shoddy construction. But how well does our own government hold up under scrutiny when it comes to corruption? Many of the bills entering law were written by lobbyists, and our byzantine tax code is designed specifically to include favors to donors.

Also, China’s record on human rights is a matter of international concern, yet nobody applies pressure on the United States to free any of our more than 2.2 million prisoners. Many of these prisoners are incarcerated for unevenly applied drug laws which target black Americans; how is this any different from the ethnic cleansings Americans complain about elsewhere in the world?

Students sometimes ask me the difference between humanistic and existential psychology. I am hard pressed to answer: the two belief systems overlap almost completely, and have grown more similar over time. If one thing stands out, it is that existentialists are more careful to consider the capacity for human evil. That is, given perfect conditions, some people will choose not to grow to meet their fullest potential, at least not in socially sanctioned ways. Some people will choose to remain small, mean, or unfree. Given the choice, some will choose slavery over liberation, self over community, hostility over peacefulness, suicide over the chance to struggle gamely on.

An existential view of foreign governments must contain this eye to how people choose not to change as we might want and, as we observe this internationally, it can help us reflect on our own broken political system. Before we try to impose American-style democracy on other countries, we first need a deep and searching look at our own democracy and its current health.

These lessons will come, as all lessons, only with time and suffering.

-- Jason Dias

Read more stories by Jason Dias

Keep up with our community - follow us on Facebook and Twitter 

Comments and Discussions

Jason, Yes, we are all well

Yes, we are all well aware that the world is full of nefarious, corrupt governments and corporations. However, perhaps percentage wise, no more so than in churches and homes. I was relieved to see you brought all this home to our own country. I would go further even to the home of our selves as individuals. However I found your comment "I choose not to participate in that system until people have finally learned" quite troublesome, first, in that it presumes you have and they haven't (learned)and I suspect such "presumed wisdom" is an attitude held by many of the rulers of the systems you condemn. Secondly, it presumes that oligarchist will simply "learn on their own" and history shows that, while a very few do, the vast majority do not, at least not without intervention of some kind, without, as Xuefu might put it, folk with a little Zhi Mian raising their voices, hands or arms. Can we really afford to forget Plato's sage warning that the price good people pay for their indifference or nonparticipation is to be ruled by evil people.

Also, remember the mote of which you speak is not just in our our national/political eye, but in our very own personal eye, the very ones with which you and I are writing one another now and with which we relate to our own families, friends, clients, colleagues,etc. Remember, when Rollo wrote of evil and where he and Roger's argued so strongly was not, primarily, with respect to politics but persons, individual human beings including you and me, our own "inner" tyrants and despots. I hope you and I don't wait around to "finally llearn" and, if we do, I hope someone with some Zhi Mian will stand up to us and punch us in our blind eyes and and bang loudly against our own iron heads.
Respectfully Yours,

Hi, Erik. I'm flattered

Hi, Erik.

I'm flattered anyone takes the time to read these posts, never mind to comment on them.

All good points. Thank you also for pointing out the mote in my eyes.

I'm no Jesus, and not even a Lu Xun, and even less a Wang Xuefu to know the way and point it out. But maybe these little blog posts are my own raised voice, my own little bit of zhi mian, an attempt to encounter the world as it is - evil and all. I hope that's the point. Rather than from a superior position, I mean to come from an outsider perspective, a foreigner in both my countries, alienated by loss and a childhood best explained by Asperger's disorder. I don't know the way, my friend, although I'm fairly sure we are nowhere near it now.

Keep on truckin', Erik. Maybe we'll meet again in China or some other mutually foreign place.


Hi Jason, I suspect quite a

Hi Jason, I suspect quite a few people actually read your posts but I was beginning to think nobody reads my repies so thanks for letting me know you have. Little did you know there are hordes of existential ""Little Brothers" out there keeping tabs on your behavior!!!

Yours is an exceptonally generous reply: honest, courageous,and with no small measure of Zhi Mian, a voice so different from your original post, and one fully acknowledging your own "insider position" as a human being. I'm surely with you in the conviction that we don't know the way right now, and, if we do, we are "nowhere near" to staying on it. Your comrade in ignorance, Erik

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn YouTube Google Plus